Political Cities.
Palgrave Macmillan
item.page.uri.label
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan
item.page.orlis-pc
SG
item.page.orlis-pl
Singapur
item.page.language
item.page.issn
item.page.zdb
item.page.orlis-av
ZLB: Kws 100,2/153
item.page.type
item.page.type-orlis
relationships.isAuthorOf
Abstract
The chapter explores the tensions between the Aboriginal context of urban development, the practices of professional planners, the participatory planning frameworks of governments and the neoliberalisation of planning governance in Australia. Rather than fitting neatly together, there are fundamental theoretical and practical tensions between Aboriginal, participatory, technocratic and neoliberal planning frameworks. Each dictates a different source of power in terms of setting the urban agenda and making planning decisions. Using the New South Wales planning system as a case study, we analyse each governance process as a discrete way of thinking about urban governance. We highlight where the political power is located to set the urban agenda and to make decisions within each of these processes. We conclude that enabling a suite of power structures in one governance space can undermine important power structures within the other governance processes.
Description
Keywords
Journal
item.page.issue
item.page.dc-source
item.page.pageinfo
211-226