Co-Working-Spaces als Treffpunkte – Impulse für die Quartiersentwicklung? Das Beispiel Heidelberg.
Springer Spektrum
Zitierfähiger Link:
Keine Vorschau verfügbar
Datum
2020
item.page.journal-title
item.page.journal-issn
item.page.volume-title
Herausgeber
Springer Spektrum
Sprache (Orlis.pc)
DE
Erscheinungsort
Heidelberg
Sprache
ISSN
0174-3635
ZDB-ID
797817-0
Standort
ZLB: Erd 29 ZB 1678
Dokumenttyp
Dokumenttyp (zusätzl.)
EDOC
Autor:innen
Zusammenfassung
Co-Working-Spaces fungieren mittlerweile in vielen Städten als neue Arbeitsorte für Wissens- und Kreativarbeit. Dieser Beitrag setzt sich am Beispiel Heidelberg mit möglichen Wechselwirkungen von Co-Working-Spaces und dem Quartier auseinander und unterscheidet dazu zwei Typen von Co-Working-Spaces: Solche, die durch Offenheit und Zugänglichkeit als Third Spaces und somit als Treffpunkt im Quartier wirken, sowie jene, die sich – einer High-Investment-Logik folgend – primär an den geschlossenen NutzerInnenkreis der Co-Working-Spaces selbst richten und somit keine Treffpunktfunktion für das Quartier haben. Aus Sicht der Quartiersentwicklung können beide Typen die lokale Ökonomie stärken, da sie neue Angebote für die Wissens- und Kreativarbeit bereitstellen und ihre NutzerInnen zusätzliche Nachfrage im Quartier generieren. Co-Working-Spaces, die als Third Spaces fungieren, können darüber hinaus Anknüpfungspunkte für die Quartiersentwicklung bieten, da ihre BetreiberInnen ein gesteigertes Interesse an einem engen Austausch mit der lokalen Ökonomie und an der Entwicklung ihrer unmittelbaren Umgebung haben.
In many cities, co-working spaces serve as new workplaces for knowledge-based and creative activities. Using the example of Heidelberg, this article deals with possible interactions between co-working spaces and their surrounding neighbourhoods and distinguishes two types of co-working spaces: those spaces that, because of their openness and accessibility, act as third spaces and thus as meeting points in the neighbourhood, as well as those that, following a high investment logic, primarily aim at serving closed user groups of the spaces and do not act as meeting points for their neighbourhoods. From a neighbourhood development perspective, both types have the potential to strengthen the local economy as they provide new services for knowledge and creative work and generate additional demand for their users in the neighbourhood. Co-working spaces that serve as third spaces can offer additional points of contact for neighbourhood development, as their providers have an enhanced interest in a close exchange with the local economy and in the development of their immediate environment.
In many cities, co-working spaces serve as new workplaces for knowledge-based and creative activities. Using the example of Heidelberg, this article deals with possible interactions between co-working spaces and their surrounding neighbourhoods and distinguishes two types of co-working spaces: those spaces that, because of their openness and accessibility, act as third spaces and thus as meeting points in the neighbourhood, as well as those that, following a high investment logic, primarily aim at serving closed user groups of the spaces and do not act as meeting points for their neighbourhoods. From a neighbourhood development perspective, both types have the potential to strengthen the local economy as they provide new services for knowledge and creative work and generate additional demand for their users in the neighbourhood. Co-working spaces that serve as third spaces can offer additional points of contact for neighbourhood development, as their providers have an enhanced interest in a close exchange with the local economy and in the development of their immediate environment.
item.page.description
Schlagwörter
Zeitschrift
Standort : Zeitschrift für angewandte Geographie
Ausgabe
2
Erscheinungsvermerk/Umfang
Seiten
73-79