Prozessintegrierte Evaluationen zur nachhaltigen Regionalentwicklung.
TH Zürich, NSL
item.page.uri.label
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
TH Zürich, NSL
item.page.orlis-pc
CH
item.page.orlis-pl
Zürich
item.page.language
item.page.issn
0521-3625
item.page.zdb
item.page.orlis-av
ZLB: 4-Zs 2586
BBR: Z 2513
IFL: I 4087
BBR: Z 2513
IFL: I 4087
item.page.type
item.page.type-orlis
relationships.isAuthorOf
Abstract
Der Begriff der "prozessintegrierte Evaluationen" lässt sich anhand der üblichen Differenzierungsmöglichkeiten von Evaluationen definieren. So sind Evaluationen nach den drei Aspekten Zeitbezug, inhaltlicher Bezug, Akteursbezug zu unterscheiden. Für problemadäquate Evaluationsformen sind theoretische Anforderungen zu beachten: Sie müssen geeignet sein, eine nachhaltige Regionalentwicklung zu analysieren und Hinweise zur Verbesserung der Prozessgestaltung geben. Andererseits ist auch die praktische Anwendbarkeit der Methoden zu diskutieren, um die Vorschläge auf die Handlungsmöglichkeiten regionaler Akteure abzustimmen. So sind etwa Gründe der Nicht-Durchführung von Evaluationen herauszufinden, da sich daraus Hinweise zu den bei der Etablierung von Evaluationen zu überwindenden Hürden ergeben. Um Erkenntnisse über geeignete Evaluationsmethoden zu gewinnen, werden Erfahrungen und Praxisansätze aus dem Bereich der räumlichen Planungen sowie wirtschafts- und sozialwissenschaftlicher Disziplinen ausgewertet. Darüber hinaus wird empirisches Material aus einer Expertenbefragung verarbeitet. difu
The article discusses how to evaluate planning for sustainable regional development in a process-integrated mode. A process-integrated evaluation is understood as an evaluation that accompanies the processes involved and is formed by the participants of the planning. First, the problems intrinsic to sustainable regional development are identified as objects of evaluation in four dimensions (ecology, economy, social aspects and organisation). In each of these dimensions, one needs to consider the plane of material reality as well as the plane of what goes on in the minds of the people involved. This leads to eight fields of evaluation. Taking into account how spatial planning was handled in the past and which methods of evaluation are being used in the areas of sociology and economy today, the key demands on process-integrated evaluations are established. One of the aspects would be that the people concerned already participate during the process of establishing the criteria and methods for these evaluationsfor a particular region. The recommendations for evaluations of sustainable regional development start with the description of the obstacles that normally make establishing the evaluations difficult. Then the elements of a program for evaluations are presented: What should be evaluated, and how and by whom and when. Finally, information is given on how to conduct an evaluation program and a meta-evaluation is presented. difu
The article discusses how to evaluate planning for sustainable regional development in a process-integrated mode. A process-integrated evaluation is understood as an evaluation that accompanies the processes involved and is formed by the participants of the planning. First, the problems intrinsic to sustainable regional development are identified as objects of evaluation in four dimensions (ecology, economy, social aspects and organisation). In each of these dimensions, one needs to consider the plane of material reality as well as the plane of what goes on in the minds of the people involved. This leads to eight fields of evaluation. Taking into account how spatial planning was handled in the past and which methods of evaluation are being used in the areas of sociology and economy today, the key demands on process-integrated evaluations are established. One of the aspects would be that the people concerned already participate during the process of establishing the criteria and methods for these evaluationsfor a particular region. The recommendations for evaluations of sustainable regional development start with the description of the obstacles that normally make establishing the evaluations difficult. Then the elements of a program for evaluations are presented: What should be evaluated, and how and by whom and when. Finally, information is given on how to conduct an evaluation program and a meta-evaluation is presented. difu
Description
Keywords
Journal
DISP
item.page.issue
Nr. 2
item.page.dc-source
item.page.pageinfo
S. 68-79