Is This Distance Teaching Planning That Bad?
Taylor & Francis
item.page.uri.label
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
item.page.orlis-pc
GB
item.page.orlis-pl
Abingdon
item.page.language
item.page.issn
0251-3625
item.page.zdb
134868-1
item.page.orlis-av
ZLB: Kws 155 ZB 6792
item.page.type
item.page.type-orlis
EDOC
relationships.isAuthorOf
Abstract
In spring 2020, university courses were moved into the virtual space due to the Covid-19 lockdown. In this paper, we use experience from courses at Gdańsk University of Technology and ETH Zurich to identify core problems in distance teaching planning and to discuss what to do and what not to do in teaching planning after the pandemic. We conclude that we will not return to the state of (teaching) affairs that we had previously. The availability of recordings of lectures and videos, de-localisation of both students and teachers, the experience of spatio-temporal autonomy will lead to new forms of teaching as both students and teachers experienced some aspects of remote teaching even more efficient than real-world teaching. On the other hand, remote teaching of elements of learning that required interaction, e.g. group and studio work, brainstorming, discussion to foster critical thinking, cannot replace the real experience of the classroom.
Description
Keywords
Journal
DISP : the planning review
item.page.issue
4
item.page.dc-source
item.page.pageinfo
107-121