Political Cities.

Palgrave Macmillan
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Palgrave Macmillan

item.page.orlis-pc

SG

item.page.orlis-pl

Singapur

item.page.language

item.page.issn

item.page.zdb

item.page.orlis-av

ZLB: Kws 100,2/153

item.page.type-orlis

Abstract

The chapter explores the tensions between the Aboriginal context of urban development, the practices of professional planners, the participatory planning frameworks of governments and the neoliberalisation of planning governance in Australia. Rather than fitting neatly together, there are fundamental theoretical and practical tensions between Aboriginal, participatory, technocratic and neoliberal planning frameworks. Each dictates a different source of power in terms of setting the urban agenda and making planning decisions. Using the New South Wales planning system as a case study, we analyse each governance process as a discrete way of thinking about urban governance. We highlight where the political power is located to set the urban agenda and to make decisions within each of these processes. We conclude that enabling a suite of power structures in one governance space can undermine important power structures within the other governance processes.

Description

Keywords

Journal

item.page.issue

item.page.dc-source

item.page.pageinfo

211-226

Citation

item.page.subject-ft

item.page.dc-subject

item.page.dc-relation-ispartofseries