Gesellschaftsanalyse und Ideengeschichte - aus biographischer Perspektive.
Zitierfähiger Link
Lade...
Datum
Zeitschriftentitel
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Bandtitel
Herausgeber
Sprache (Orlis.pc)
DE
Erscheinungsort
Berlin
Sprache
ISSN
ZDB-ID
Standort
ZLB: 4-2007/1241
Dokumenttyp
Dokumenttyp (zusätzl.)
FO
Autor:innen
Zusammenfassung
Der Kolloquiumsvortrag "Gesellschaftsanalyse und Ideengeschichte" beinhaltet auf der Grundlage des sozialwissenschaftlichen Arbeitsprogramms des Autors wissenschaftshistorische und wissenschaftspolitische Erfahrungen und Analysen zur Entwicklung der DDR-Soziologie. Im Mittelpunkt stehen ihre Entstehungsbedingungen, Leistungen und Defizite. An Hand ihres Antifaschismus und der Kritik bürgerlicher Gesellschaftstheorien werden prägende Ausgangspositionen benannt und am Beispiel historischer und aktueller Klassenanalysen Ansatzpunkte weiterführender Forschungen problematisiert. Im Anhang wird auf weitere Veröffentlichungen des Autors zu hier aufgeworfenen Problemen und Personen verwiesen. An drei Beispielen werden konkrete Aktivitäten aus den ersten Nachkriegsjahren (soziologische Lehrveranstaltungen an den Universitäten), im Prozess der Neu-Institutionalisierung der Soziologie (Vorschläge an die SED-Parteiführung 1962) und aus der Endphase der DDR (Lehrprogramm zur Geschichte der Soziologie 1988/89) dokumentiert.
Neither the enforcement nor the management schools of compliance can explain cross-national variation in the number of violations of European Union law or in the number of cases settled by the European Court of Justice (EQJ). These patterns of non-compliance require the inclusion of the procedural dimension of compliance, which is affected by the degree of autonomy executives have vis-à-vis their national parliaments. Multivariate analysis was applied to a database of violations of the European Community Treaty from 1978 to 2002, to determine why violations may or may not be settled by the ECJ. The results show that increasing the amount of democratic legitimacy in the European governance process can limit its effectiveness in the area of compliance with EU primary legislation, namely, the EC Treaty. This has important implications for understanding the process of European integration, given the continued existence of a democratic deficit in the EU. Unless democratic pathways are created which would allow EU citizens to shape the EU legislative process via their national representatives to the European Parliament such that European law would conflict less with national law, EU membership will increasingly mean fewer privileges and more onerous legal obligations.
Neither the enforcement nor the management schools of compliance can explain cross-national variation in the number of violations of European Union law or in the number of cases settled by the European Court of Justice (EQJ). These patterns of non-compliance require the inclusion of the procedural dimension of compliance, which is affected by the degree of autonomy executives have vis-à-vis their national parliaments. Multivariate analysis was applied to a database of violations of the European Community Treaty from 1978 to 2002, to determine why violations may or may not be settled by the ECJ. The results show that increasing the amount of democratic legitimacy in the European governance process can limit its effectiveness in the area of compliance with EU primary legislation, namely, the EC Treaty. This has important implications for understanding the process of European integration, given the continued existence of a democratic deficit in the EU. Unless democratic pathways are created which would allow EU citizens to shape the EU legislative process via their national representatives to the European Parliament such that European law would conflict less with national law, EU membership will increasingly mean fewer privileges and more onerous legal obligations.
Beschreibung
Schlagwörter
Zeitschrift
Ausgabe
item.page.dc-source
Seiten
76 S.
Zitierform
Freie Schlagworte
item.page.dc-subject
Deskriptor(en)
item.page.dc-relation-ispartofseries
Discussion papers; P 2006-008